The Deplorable U.S. Infant Mortality Rate
From: http://www.chiroaccess.com/Articles/The-Deplorable-US-Infant-Mortality-Rate.aspx?id=0000155
Despite great technology, the United States has an infant mortality rate like that of a third world nation. The procedure intensive approach to childbirth in the U.S. is believed to be a significant contributing factor. A survey of 1,573 pregnant women reported significant interventions such as “regional analgesia (76%), ruptured membranes (65%), forceful pushing (75%), and cesarean sections (32%). The U.S. rate of cesarean sections in 2005 was the fourth highest among 25 countries. The epidural has many negative features. When used in labor it extends the length of time from 5 to 7 hrs, causes a raised temperature greater than 100.4 degrees C in 15-30% of infants and mothers, and produces a very sleepy baby at birth, irritable and with increased crying for 3 weeks.”
The statistics from research published this year highlight this tragedy:
· In 1960 the U.S. ranked 12th among other nations in infant mortality
· By 2005 the U.S. infant mortality rate had fallen to 30th
· In 2007, 31% of U.S. births were by cesarean section
· Preterm births in the U.S. have also risen to 36%
Countries using fewer drugs and fewer invasive procedures like Finland and Sweden have the lowest infant mortality rates of industrialized countries.
Academy of breastfeeding medicine founder’s lecture 2009: Maternity care re-evaluated.
Breastfeed Med. 2010 Feb;5:3-8.
Klaus M, Klaus P.
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, USA. phyllisklaus@sbcglobal.net
In the 1990s a rising tide of medical, surgical, and instrumental interventions served to make childbirth almost treated like a disease. This report supports a different approach to childbirth. A case and discussions of induction are presented. A national survey of 1,573 pregnant women throughout the United States was collected. Although most U.S. childbearing women are low risk, childbirth is “procedure intensive.” Women reported significant interventions such as regional analgesia (76%), ruptured membranes (65%), forceful pushing (75%), and cesarean sections (32%). The U.S. rate of cesarean sections in 2005 was the fourth highest among 25 countries. The epidural has many negative features. When used in labor it extends the length of time from 5 to 7 h, causes a raised temperature greater than 100.4 degrees C in 15-30% of infants and mothers, and produces a very sleepy baby at birth, irritable and with increased crying for 3 weeks. The three hormones that relieve pain are turned off by the epidural or a cesarean section. Maternal and infant mortality was doubled as a result of cesarean section. After cesarean sections, subsequent pregnancies have types of abnormal attachments of the placenta to the uterus. British physicians recommend normal birth, defined as labor that starts on its own and uses no analgesia, no inductions, no interventions, no epidurals, and no cesarean sections. The doula’s presence decreases labor length, significantly decreases cesarean sections, means less use of pain medicine, and gives greater breastfeeding rates.
Annual summary of vital statistics: 2007.
Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):4-15. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
Heron M, Sutton PD, Xu J, Ventura SJ, Strobino DM, Guyer B.
Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA. mheron@cdc.gov
The number of births in the United States increased between 2006 and 2007 (preliminary estimate of 4,317,119) and is the highest ever recorded. Birth rates increased among all age groups (15 to 44 years); the increase among teenagers is contrary to a long-term pattern of decline during 1991-2005. The total fertility rate increased 1% in 2007 to 2122.5 births per 1000 women. This rate was above replacement level for the second consecutive year. The proportion of all births to unmarried women increased to 39.7% in 2007, up from 38.5% in 2006, with increases noted for all race and Hispanic-origin groups and within each age group of 15 years and older. In 2007, 31.8% of all births occurred by cesarean delivery, up 2% from 2006. Increases in cesarean delivery were noted for most age groups and for non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic women. Multiple-birth rates, which rose rapidly over the last several decades, did not increase during 2005-2006. The 2007 preterm birth rate was 12.7%, a decline of 1% from 2006. The low-birth-weight rate also declined in 2007 to 8.2%. The infant mortality rate was 6.77 infant deaths per 1000 live births in 2007, which is not significantly different from the 2006 rate. Non-Hispanic black infants continued to have much higher rates than non-Hispanic white and Hispanic infants. States in the southeastern United States had the highest infant and fetal mortality rates. The United States continues to rank poorly in international comparisons of infant mortality. Life expectancy at birth reached a record high of 77.9 years in 2007. Crude death rates for children aged 1 to 19 years decreased by 2.5% between 2006 and 2007. Unintentional injuries and homicide were the first and second leading causes of death, respectively, accounting for 53.7% of all deaths to children and adolescents in 2007.
Behind international rankings of infant mortality: how the United States compares with Europe.
NCHS Data Brief. 2009 Nov;(23):1-8.
MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA.
Infant mortality is an important indicator of the health of a nation, and the recent stagnation (since 2000) in the U.S. infant mortality rate has generated concern among researchers and policy makers. The percentage of preterm births in the United States has risen 36% since 1984 (1). In this report we compare infant mortality rates between the United States and Europe. We also compare two factors that determine the infant mortality rate-gestational age-specific infant mortality rates and the percentage of preterm births. U.S. data are from the Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set (2,3), and European data for 2004 are from the recently published European Perinatal Health Report (4). We also examine requirements for reporting a live birth among countries to assess the possible effect of reporting differences on infant mortality data. All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.
The challenge of infant mortality: have we reached a plateau?
Public Health Rep. 2009 Sep-Oct;124(5):670-81.
MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ.
Reproductive Statistics Branch, Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Rd., Room 7318, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA. mfm1@cdc.gov
OBJECTIVES: Infant mortality is a major indicator of the health of a nation. We analyzed recent patterns and trends in U.S. infant mortality, with an emphasis on two of the greatest challenges: (1) persistent racial and ethnic disparities and (2) the impact of preterm and low birthweight delivery.
METHODS: Data from the national linked birth/infant death datasets were used to compute infant mortality rates per 100,000 live births by cause of death (COD), and per 1,000 live births for all other variables. Infant mortality rates and other measures of infant health were analyzed and compared. Leading and preterm-related CODs, and international comparisons of infant mortality rates were also examined.
RESULTS: Despite the rapid decline in infant mortality during the 20th century, the U.S. infant mortality rate did not decline from 2000 to 2005, and declined only marginally in 2006. Racial and ethnic disparities in infant mortality have persisted and increased, as have the percentages of preterm and low birthweight deliveries. After decades of improvement, the infant mortality rate for very low birthweight infants remained unchanged from 2000 to 2005. Infant mortality rates from congenital malformations and sudden infant death syndrome declined; however, rates for preterm-related CODs increased. The U.S. international ranking in infant mortality fell from 12th place in 1960 to 30th place in 2005.
CONCLUSIONS: Infant mortality is a complex and multifactorial problem that has proved resistant to intervention efforts. Continued increases in preterm and low birthweight delivery present major challenges to further improvement in the infant mortality rate.
ChiroACCESS Article: http://www.chiroaccess.com/Articles/The-Deplorable-US-Infant-Mortality-Rate.aspx?id=0000155
This information is provided to you for use in conjunction with your clinical judgment and the specific needs of the patient.
The article was written by the combined efforts of the ChiroACCESS editorial staff and published on April 26, 2010
Can you imagine how much trauma is caused when the birth canal is senselessly closed up to 30% (most births) or senselessly KEPT closed up to 30% when babies get stuck and OBGYNs pull with forceps/vacuums (1 in 10 births)?
“Routine Positions in Labor Cause Unnecessary Birth Trauma…”
In vaginal births, 4.6% of term neonates suffer unexplained brain bleeds and up to 10% suffer neonatal encephalopathy. These injuries may be avoided by decreasing distortion of fetal skulls, from pelvic contracture at delivery. The popular semi-recumbent position places the laboring woman squarely on her sacral
apex. This closes her pelvic opening and creates a undue stress and difficulty in the baby’s descent.”
Labor posture. Gastaldo TD. Birth 1992 Dec;19(4):230
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgicmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1472275&dopt=Abstract
Semisitting/birth-canal-closing is OBVIOUS criminal negligence: In
semisitting and dorsal/”lying on your back” delivery positions, gravity closes the birth canal up to 30%, a fact which has been known to medicine since early last century. For the simple biomechanics and for a radiographic cite and a clinical cite from the medical literature, see Gastaldo TD.
Letter. BIRTH. 1992;19(4):230-1.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/bir/19/4. Thanks to WileyInterscience,
FREE ONLINE ACCESS was recently re-instated.
OBGYNs are committing obvious sometimes-fatal mass birth-canal-closing/SPINAL MANIPULATION child abuse.
WORSE: OBGYNs are KEEPING birth canals closed up to 30% – keeping semisitting or dorsal when babies get stuck and forceps/vacuums are used to pull (1 in 10 births) – with OBGYNs sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.
Regarding the 4.6% suffering unexplained brain bleeds, a more recent MRI study (Looney et al. 200_), found around 25% of babies birthed vaginally suffering unexplained brain bleeds.
DCs need to report – and urge others to report – even though law enforcement is looking the other way.
DCs need to KEEP reporting until law enforcement STOPS looking the other way.
Women should not have to ASK for the “extra” up to 30% of pelvic outlet area for their babies.
Most women don’t KNOW to ask.
In most jurisdictions, child abuse reports from DCs are mandatory when abuse is so much as SUSPECTED.
In most jurisdictions, child abuse reports from EVERYONE are encouraged when abuse is so much as suspected.
“Anyone who has reason to believe that a child has been or is likely to be abused or neglected has a legal duty under the Child, Family and Community Service Act to report the matter.”
http://www.mcf.gov.bc.ca/child_protection/reportabuse.htm
Reporting Child Abuse Helpline Number
For technical reasons the ministry has changed its Helpline for Children telephone number to 310-1234. This is a toll free number. It is a local telephone number anywhere in the province.
Over the next two years people calling the operator and asking for the old Zenith 1234 line will be transferred to the new 310-1234 number.
Call the Helpline when you have a concern about the safety and well-being of a child.
Duty to report abuse or suspected abuse
Anyone who has reason to believe that a child has been or is likely to be abused or neglected has a legal duty under the Child, Family and Community Service Act to report the matter.
How to report
Report to a child protection social worker in either a Ministry of Children and Family Development office, or a First Nations child welfare agency that provides child protection services.
Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., call your local district office (listed in the blue pages of your phone book).
Monday to Friday, 4:30 p.m. to 8:30 a.m. and all day Saturday, Sunday and on statutory holidays, call the Helpline for Children. Dial 310-1234 (no area code needed).
After Hours Line
For emergencies outside office hours (8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m., Monday to Friday).
•Vancouver, North Shore Richmond, call 604 660-4927
•Lower Mainland, Burnaby, Delta, Maple Ridge, Langley, call 604 660-8180
•For the rest of the province, call toll-free 1 800 663-9122